top of page

Coaching High Performers vs. Struggling Reps

  • Jan 17
  • 3 min read

coaching high performers vs struggling sales reps

One of the most common mistakes sales leaders make is coaching everyone the same way.


It feels fair. It feels efficient. And it’s completely ineffective.


High performers and struggling reps need fundamentally different coaching approaches. When leaders blur that line, two things happen: top talent gets frustrated or disengaged, and struggling reps feel overwhelmed, micromanaged, or misunderstood.


I learned this lesson the hard way.


The Moment It Clicked


Early in my leadership career, I inherited a team that included two very different reps.


One was a consistent top performer. He hit his number quarter after quarter, ran his territory like a business, and rarely needed help. The other was struggling—missed forecasts, reactive in deals, and clearly lacking confidence.


Wanting to be “fair,” I coached them the same way.


Same pipeline reviews. Same questions. Same level of inspection.


Within a few months, both were frustrated—but for opposite reasons.


The high performer started disengaging. He’d show up to meetings prepared, only to walk through details he already had under control. I could feel him thinking, “Why are we spending time on this?”


The struggling rep, meanwhile, grew quieter. The more I pushed for precision and accountability, the more he shut down. He wasn’t getting better—he was getting defensive.


That’s when it hit me: I wasn’t coaching to the rep. I was coaching to my comfort.


Once I changed my approach, everything changed.


The Core Difference: Elevation vs. Stabilization


At a high level, the goal of coaching differs by performance tier.


  • High performers need elevation

  • Struggling reps need stabilization


High performers already execute the fundamentals. Coaching them is about sharpening judgment, expanding impact, and preventing complacency.


Struggling reps are often battling inconsistency. Coaching them is about restoring clarity, building repeatability, and creating confidence.


Same leader. Same meeting cadence. Completely different intent.


Coaching High Performers: Don’t Slow Them Down


After my wake-up call, I stopped treating my top performer like a problem to manage and started treating him like a partner.


Here’s what changed.


1. From Tactics to Strategy


Instead of reviewing every deal, we talked about patterns.


Questions like:


  • “Which customers deserve more attention—and which don’t?”

  • “What are you intentionally saying no to?”

  • “Where do you see the biggest growth lever next year?”


He leaned in immediately. Coaching became energizing instead of redundant.


2. From Effort to Leverage


Rather than pushing more activity, we focused on scale—bigger opportunities, more influence, and better use of time.


He didn’t need motivation. He needed permission to think bigger.


3. From Quota to Challenge


I gave him stretch assignments—complex deals, mentoring newer reps, exposure to senior leaders.


Engagement returned. Performance followed.


Leader mindset: You’re not fixing a high performer—you’re unlocking upside.


Coaching Struggling Reps: Clarity Before Pressure


With the struggling rep, I did the opposite of what I’d been doing.


I slowed down.


1. Diagnose Before Prescribing


Instead of demanding better outcomes, I asked better questions:


  • “Where do deals tend to stall?”

  • “What feels hardest right now?”

  • “Walk me through how you prep for a call.”


The issue wasn’t effort—it was focus and confidence.


2. Simplify the Game


We narrowed his world:


  • Fewer priority deals

  • Clear daily activity standards

  • One skill focus at a time


Momentum replaced overwhelm.


3. Separate Coaching from Consequences


I made coaching a safe space for learning—not a disguised performance review.


When accountability was needed, we addressed it clearly and separately.


Leader mindset: You’re rebuilding the foundation—not demanding the penthouse.


The Leadership Trap: One Style Feels “Fair”


Uniform coaching feels equitable—but it’s lazy leadership.


Fairness isn’t sameness.

Fairness is giving each rep what they need to succeed.


High performers want autonomy and challenge.

Struggling reps want clarity and belief.


The same coaching approach serves neither.


The Best Leaders Ask One Question Consistently


The best leaders I’ve worked with ask this regularly:


“What does this rep need from me right now?”


That answer evolves. High performers stumble. Struggling reps rise. Coaching must adapt in real time.


When leaders get this right:


  • Top talent stays engaged

  • Struggling reps improve faster—or exit sooner with clarity

  • Coaching becomes a growth tool, not a threat


That’s when performance becomes sustainable.


And that’s when leadership actually scales.



Just tell me where you want to take it.

Comments


  • LinkedIn

©2022 by Simply Breaux. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page